Review of Day of the Dead 2: Contagium (2005) by Jacob F — 21 Jul 2007
Within the first three minutes (I actually checked) you can tell it's going to suck.
Within the first 4 you realize it's a sequel in name only (unless Romero deleted the scenes with Russian speaking zombies).
17 minutes: OH GOD, KILL ME! WHY AM I STILL WATCHING! Terrible script, terrible acting, terrible effects.
25 minutes: Dammit, where's the zombies? I don't care about poorly acted mental patients and their "eternal love".
36 minutes: high school kids make better films.
38 minutes: I've done better make-up jobs than this, and what's with the angels/aliens/crazy lights.
41 MinutEs: SAUSAGES!!!
50 minutes: I'd rather be crapping blood, but I paid to watch this so I can't shut it off.
64 minutes: I just realized the first of the movie took place years in the past, not days in the future.
67 minutes: Crap, that means they'll never explain russian zombie.
70: I thought they didn't bleed...
77: Suckingly sucktastic. OH GOD, LET IT END!
80: russian zombie explanation sucks.
82: thank god they ate fatty, he sucked.
88: finally, some ok zombies.
90: I know there's no muzzle flashes, but I'l starting to doubt they even pull the triggers.
91: OH GOD, IT SUCKS AGAIN!
96: oh crap, they run. destroy this film.
101: I give it a full star instead of half a star only because it had a couple of good make-up jobs. Hunt for still photos, avoid this film at all costs.
This review of Day of the Dead 2: Contagium (2005) was written by Jacob F on 21 July 2007.
Day of the Dead 2: Contagium has generally received very negative reviews.
Was this review helpful?
