Review of Saw VI (2009) by Alex M — 21 Sep 2010

In my, strictly neutral point of view, "Saw" is a really bright effect, in spite of that, I'm not a fan of this franchise, the movie just fired when back in 2004 came a cheap movie (literally little more than a million dollars) from an absolutely unknown director James Wang, a trivial story, he just blew the whole world, his work immediately began to gather a crowd of fans, from the horn of plenty poured continuation enviable fecundity, every new year - another part. So we are not pleased, even cheap slasher, and now an intriguing, acute thriller makes us enjoy every year, but it is very unfortunate that the continuation is becoming meaningless, and, with the growth of the budget, all the harder and more terrible. Pleasant exception has become the current "Saw", which is the ideological successor of the first two parts. To avoid confusion, for it is only recently finished watching, I'll break his review of a few short chapters, for so my thoughts will carry out a senseless distance.

The plot and its features.

Detective Hoffman masterfully concealing his duplicity on the other, continues to bloody work of John Cramer, the more so, being a cop, maniac aware of all cases and did not catch him by surprise, and Strum, whose death no one knows, is still the prime suspect, but, with all your mind Hoffman - not Kramer. In addition, his plans are crumbling before our eyes, when they find a clue cause Seth Baxter, yes one more character to this presumed dead, makes pretty nervous-looking cold-blooded detective. However, even exposure can not stop the game, especially when you consider that this game - perhaps the latest and most ingenious idea of the designer.

This time, the main victim becomes the shark insurance business - William, who will be able to stroke his hands to decide who will live and who will go to the forefathers. It is easy to manipulate the fate of others, he becomes helpless when he must decide the fate of their friends. Could the dispassionate businessman to survive and save their employees and friends in a bloody game, hosted by a maniac, or he will fall victim to his impotence?

PS. Few infuriates the fact that from the psychological horror film makes the budget trash. Of course, blood and meat should be, but not on such a meaningless trifles. It is clear that the creators want more of tin, but that Cramer was never a supporter of violence.

Traps and actors.

I very vaguely remember the danger of the third and subsequent pieces, but well remember the first two traps, I think, the ways of torture and murder pretty original, which stands alone "dyhalka-szhimalka. Karabinistaya carousel too pleased with novelty, but in a completely idiotic looks like a maze, it is clear that the writers, in all its diversity, little did not have enough imagination, for looks And this trap is very absurd. I'm not vain noted six "Saw" at the first two, for the rest of the focus was on raschelenku more than worthwhile, and in this part we see the opposite. That there is only one quotation inimitable Tobin Bell, who, with a dispassionate view says:

- You would think that the living can only judge the living. Do you think that the dead do not get to your soul. You are deeply mistaken, William. Very deep.

Mark actors, in principle, burning desire does not arise, except, of course, the inimitable Bell, sophisticated logic that makes people start to appreciate life. Costas Mandylor quite mastered his role, but hardly in this incredible amount of his work since his character is wooden, bland, cold and embodies him self. Peter Outerbridge coped well with their role, but I, for some reason, it is surprising just incredibly boring person. He good actor, but here seems - very stealth. Even some of the minor characters to memorize more than him. However, this did not detract from his talent.

And finally sweet. Female. All of them we've seen before, but they continue to please his game and appeal. Shawnee Smith, a long-standing love of the creator of "Saw", as Amanda looks good, even though a lot of screen time. Not entirely clear why put in a movie character Samantha Lemoul, or so we hint at another, the future, the main character?

In the end, I want to put in a word about Betsy Russell, who played just great Jill, as the character she obviously neodnostoronny, and even talent Betsy did their job, after Tobin Bell Best Actor laurels from me to get Miss Russell.

We summarize.

Before us is the ideological successor of the first two parts of the now legendary franchise, which differs slightly from the third, fourth and fifth parts, which tell us the basic secrets of movie box bequeathed Kramer, for example. Blood and flesh in abundance, but the trap looks interesting, Acting as the height, but what about the ending. It was clear that the mysterious envelope will have an effect, but in that way - certainly a shock. After the second part is the ending for me is the most unexpected and mysterious.

10 of 10.

PS. Still, Kramer genius. For only the genius can within a few weeks after his death to be able to organize a new game. Even loss of life can prevent the bloody designs of the designer.