Review of Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011) by Themacmeister — 06 Jan 2012
I would have really enjoyed this film, had it not been shot digitally, and not post-processed to the point of being so dark, it was a strain to make out exactly what was on the screen. Not that post-processing is a bad thing -- it was put to good use in Se7en by Brad Fincher, but when the screen is S-O-O-O dark, and the action is so jerky (due to digital photography), that you find yourself asking yourself exactly what you made out of the last scene (multiplied by the amount of scenes in the film). There is one scene set in full daylight about 3/4 of the way through -- and to give you an idea, set your monitor brightness to 5% -- now you have an idea of how dark this film is.
There is no twist or turn in the screenplay. It is so predictable as to be laughable. Stephen Fry was a pleasant addition, but his part is woefully under-utilised.
I found the original film to be a surprisingly refreshing film, albeit with too much CG, but action packed and humorous, with plenty of wit.
This film does not rate in comparison, or on its own.
This review of Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011) was written by Themacmeister on 06 January 2012.
Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?