Review of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 (2012) by Smijatov — 10 Dec 2012
First thing's first: I am not a Twilight fan. Therefore, giving the film a 5/10 is quite good, mind you. I had not seen the one film before, because I thought "New Moon" was horrible, horrible, horrible, but a friend took me out so figured might as well.
To tell the truth, this is not a bad film. Nor is it a good film. It's there in between, in mediocrity. Let's start with visuals - the effects can be pretty nice, but I just couldn't get over the horrible editing with them, especially when they run "supersonic" or whatever it is.
Made the film look amateurish and cheap. Other effects were quite good. Acting - not bad. Stewart, whom I usually dislike strongly, was actually bearable. The rest of the cast was ok, too. Storyline was a bit problematic.
Ultimately, nothing really happens in the film. I... yeah, that's really it. There's all this builtup but it doesn't quite work out. It just doesn't quite match up with...well, anything. So, comparatively, it was rather decent, but the story was still bad.
Bottom line, I guess. Better than the other Twilight films I've seen (only first two) but still not a good film.
This review of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 (2012) was written by Smijatov on 10 December 2012.
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?