Review of Underworld (2003) by Danielc. — 19 Sep 2003
Underworld, more like under"pants", this film was awful, for an alleged action film this really was pittiful. For a little over two hours I sat watching this film and the only time my addrenaline rushed was when my mate accidently broke wind.
The acting, other than Kate Beckinsale, was appalling, especially head vampire 'Victor'. He was supposed to be a lord of the underworld though... he acted camper than a row of tents. I gave this film 1 because the special effects were good, but if it were for the plot, script, acting or action then this would have recieved nothing, perhaps even a minus if that were possible! oh and as for the comparisons to the matrix, well the only similarities were that they were both shown in a cinema.
This review of Underworld (2003) was written by Danielc. on 19 September 2003.
Underworld has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
